| 94 | 0 | 60 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
南水北调中线工程通水前后,丹江口库区及其上游流域生态环境保护及社会经济发展发生了显著变化。以流域内十堰市、南阳市、汉中市、安康市、商洛市5个主要地市为基本评估单元,构建了包含39项指标的流域保护治理与高质量发展综合评估指标体系,系统评估了2014—2022年流域生态环境保护与高质量发展水平,并采取耦合协调度法分析了生态环境与经济社会两大子系统间的耦合协调程度。结果表明:在创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享等5个社会经济维度上的指标值总体呈现上升趋势,经济社会发展质量指数均值由0.521上升至0.699;在生态资源状态、环境压力、资源保护与节约、水安全保障等4个生态环境维度上的指标值总体呈现上升趋势,生态环境治理保护指数均值由0.737上升至0.881;5市生态环境与经济社会两系统间耦合协调度均值由0.611上升至0.782,且自2016年起5市均达到基本协调状态,2022年达到中级及以上等级协调状态,其中十堰市达到了良好协调状态;流域保护与发展成效显著,但仍面临经济社会转型动力不足与生态环境保护长效机制欠缺的挑战。未来需进一步优化经济发展模式,提升水质安全保障能力,强化法治保障与长效政策支撑。研究结果可为推进丹江口库区及其上游流域生态环境保护与经济社会发展提供参考。
Abstract:Significant changes have occurred in the ecological environment protection and social and economic development of the Danjiangkou Reservoir area and its upstream basin before and after the operation of the Middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project.Taking five prefecture-level cities (Shiyan City,Nanyang City,Hanzhong City,Ankang City,and Shangluo City) as the basic evaluation units,a comprehensive evaluation index system comprising 39 indicators for basin protection,governance,and high-quality development was constructed.This study systematically evaluated the level of ecological environment protection and high-quality development in the basin from 2014 to 2022,and employed a coupling coordination degree method to analyze the coupling coordination degree between the two subsystems of ecological environment and economic society.The research results indicate that:(1) The indicator values in the five socio-economic dimensions of innovation,coordination,green,openness,and sharing generally showed an upward trend,and the average quality index of economic and social development increased from 0.521 to 0.699.(2) The overall trend of indicator values in four dimensions of ecological environment (ecological resource status,environmental pressure,resource protection and conservation,and water security guarantee) exhibited an upward trend,with the average ecological environment governance and protection index increasing from 0.737 to 0.881.(3) The average coupling coordination degree between ecological environment and economic society in the five cities increased from 0.611 to 0.782.All five cities reached basic coordination starting in 2016,achieving intermediate or higher level coordination by 2022,with Shiyan City achieving a good coordination state.(4) The basin protection and development have achieved significant results,but still face challenges such as insufficient driving force for economic and social transformation,and a lack of long-term mechanisms for ecological environment protection.Future efforts should focus on further optimizing the economic development model,enhancing the water quality guarantee capabilities,and strengthening legal protection and long-term policy support.The research findings can provide references for advancing ecological environment protection and economic and social development in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area and its upstream basin.
[1]沈东亮,史晓刚,李玉英,等.南水北调中线水源区生态产品价值实现路径[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2025,23(4),873-882.
[2]李飞.维护南水北调中线水源工程“三个安全”实践与思考[J].中国水利,2024(20):15-20.
[3]杨明明,赵勇,秦长海,等.南水北调东、中线一期工程综合效益评估及预测[J].水利学报,2025,56(5):659-671.
[4]郭延成.南水北调工程通水十年的意义和效益[J].生态经济,2025,41(2):9-12.
[5]许继军,梁雅余,曾子悦.南水北调中线一期工程受水区生态效益评价指标体系研究[J].长江科学院院报,2025,42(9):34-41.
[6]郭利,李晓艳.汉江上游城市群绿色发展指标体系的构建及对策[J].农村经济与科技,2021,32(22):25-27.
[7]刘玒玒,刘书芳.长江经济带生态保护与高质量发展耦合协调的时空演变及障碍因子[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2025,58(1):20-32.
[8]郏鹏鑫,杨博,王红瑞,等.长江经济带产业绿色发展等级评估[J].水资源保护,2023,39(1):142-149.
[9]田培,韩昊廷,李佳,等.长江经济带水资源开发保护与绿色发展的耦合协调关系研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(10):2085-2097.
[10]陈思宇.长江经济带城市绿色发展评估与时空特征研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2020.
[11]张晓娟,赵辉,王红梅,等.汉江上游水资源涵养与生态环境保护研究[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2017,36(12):5315-5320.
[12]李善智.汉江上游干流及其秦岭南麓典型支流浮游植物群落特征及水质生物评价[D].西安:西安理工大学,2022.
[13]发展和改革委员会.丹江口库区及上游水污染防治和水土保持“十四五”规划[EB/OL].(2021-12-01)[2025-09-01].https://zfxxgk.ndrc.gov.cn/web/iteminfo.jsp?id=18384.
[14]徐新良,刘纪远,张树文,等.中国多时期土地利用土地覆被遥感监测数据集(CNLUCC)[EB/OL].[2025-07-15].https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/DOI.aspx?DOIID=54.
[15]孙继琼.黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展的耦合协调:评价与趋势[J].财经科学,2021(3):106-118.
[16]孙久文,崔雅琪,张皓.黄河流域城市群生态保护与经济发展耦合的时空格局与机制分析[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(7):1673-1690.
[17]SAATY T L.How to Make a Decision:The Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1990,48(1):9-26.
[18]KARMESHU.Entropy Measures,Maximum Entropy Principle and Emerging Applications[M].Heidelberg:Springer,2003.
[19]ZAHEDI F.The Analytic Hierarchy Process:A Survey of the Method and Its Applications[J].Interfaces,1986,16(4):96-108.
[20]STORE R,KANGAS J.Integrating Spatial Multi-criteria Evaluation and Expert Knowledge for GIS-based Habitat Suitability Modelling[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55(2):79-93.
[21]王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
[22]闻豪,文风.“一带一路”重点省份水资源-经济-生态环境耦合协调分析[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2019,52(10):870-877.
[23]任志远,徐茜,杨忍.基于耦合模型的陕西省农业生态环境与经济协调发展研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(12):14-19.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19679/j.cnki.cjjsjj.2025.0606
中图分类号:X321
引用信息:
[1]许继军,曾子悦,谈华炜,等.丹江口库区及其上游流域治理保护与高质量发展研究[J].长江技术经济,2025,9(06):35-44+71.DOI:10.19679/j.cnki.cjjsjj.2025.0606.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3205600); 湖北省地球科学基础学科研究中心青年培育项目(HRCES-202518)
2025-09-04
2025
2025-11-12
2025
1
2025-12-15
2025-12-15