| 360 | 7 | 242 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
我国进入高质量发展阶段,生态文明建设及生态修复成为国家及流域治理重大需求和研究热点。以长江流域为例,分析了流域生态系统修复的时空尺度与功能关系,并通过长江珍稀生物特点、栖息地空间尺度和典型生态修复案例分析,讨论生态修复尺度与方法关系。研究表明:长江流域跨越我国东西部,气候水文及地理地貌差异巨大,生态系统时空尺度划分应该兼顾水域与陆域,空间尺度可以划分为6个层次,时间尺度应该考虑生物生命周期及栖息地形成时间。流域生态修复方法应该采用工程与非工程措施结合。对于生态保护区及景观河段以上生态空间,应该以自然修复等非工程措施为主,并采取适应性的管理措施,对于场地及工程河段的生态修复应采用工程与非工程措施结合。在生态系统修复效果评价上,应该以生态系统功能提升为主,兼顾自然景观保护和历史文化遗产的传承。
Abstract:As China enters the stage of high-quality development,the ecological civilization construction and ecological restoration have become a major demand and research focus of basin governance. This paper examines the relationship between spatio-temporal scale and function of ecosystem restoration in the Yangtze River Basin. Through the analysis of rare organisms,habitat spatial scale and typical ecological restoration cases in the Yangtze River,this paper presents the relation between the scale and methods of ecological restoration. Findings reveal that the Yangtze River basin spans the eastern and western parts of China,which exhibit significant disparities in climate,hydrology and geographical landform. It is imperative to consider both the water area and the land area when determining the spatial scale of ecosystem restoration. Accordingly,the spatial scale can be divided into 6 levels,while in terms of time scale,it is necessary to account for biological life cycle and the time required for habitat formation. The restoration approach for the river basin should integrate both engineering and non-engineering measures. For ecological protection areas and ecological space in the upstream of landscape river section,non-engineering measures such as natural restoration should be the mainstay with adaptive management measures. For ecological restoration of sites and engineered reaches,a combination of engineering and non-engineering measures is recommended. In the evaluation of ecosystem restoration outcomes,emphasis should be placed on the improvement of ecosystem functions while considering the preservation of natural landscapes and historical and cultural heritage.
[1]王夏晖,何军,牟雪洁,等.中国生态保护修复20年:回顾与展望[J].中国环境管理,2021(5):85-92.
[2]李锋,成超男,杨锐.生态系统修复国内外研究进展与展望[J].生物多样性,2022,30(10):312-323.
[3]董哲仁.生态水工学的理论框架[J].水利学报,2003(1):1-7.
[4]董哲仁.河流生态修复[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[5]陈晓.重庆市山水林田湖草生态保护修复试点实践与启示[J].南方农业,2021,15(2):16-17.
[6]陈阳,王西平,甄娜,等.基于生态系统服务理论内涵的山水林田湖草生态保护修复实践:以河南省南太行地区试点工程为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):701-710.
[7]夏军,陈进.长江大保护实践与对策[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2022,20(4):625-630.
[8]陈进.长江健康评估与保护实践[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(2):1-6,20.
[9]吴钢,赵萌,王辰星.山水林田湖草生态保护修复的理论支撑体系研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8685-8691.
[10]邹长新,王燕,王文林,等.山水林田湖草系统原理与生态保护修复研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(11):961-967.
[11]王志芳,高世昌,苗利梅,等.国土空间生态保护修复范式研究[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(3):1-8.
[12]范树印.科学开展山水林田湖草一体化保护和修复的指引:《山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程指南》技术逻辑解读[J].青海国土经略,2020(5):27-29.
[13]周妍,陈妍,应凌霄,等.山水林田湖草生态保护修复技术框架研究[J].地学前缘,2021,28(4):14-24.
[14]陈进.长江自然湿地水循环特点及功能[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(8):1705-1711.
[15]陈进,黄薇.河流健康评价理论及在长江的应用[M].武汉:长江出版社,2010.
[16]陈进.长江生态系统特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(6):1-6.
[17]于莉莉,汪浩,沈文星.陆生野生动物保护:生境破坏与机制响应[J].生物学杂志,2016,33(4):92-96.
[18]谢平.从历史起源和现代生态透视长江的生物多样性危机[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
[19]洪玉珍,孟顺龙,陈家长.鱼类栖息地保护技术研究进展[J].农学学报,2023,13(3):82-87.
[20]陈进.流域横向生态补偿进展及发展趋势[J].长江科学院院报,2022,39(2):1-6,20.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19679/j.cnki.cjjsjj.2023.0508
中图分类号:X171.4
引用信息:
[1]陈进.长江流域生态修复尺度、功能及方法探讨[J].长江技术经济,2023,7(05):45-52.DOI:10.19679/j.cnki.cjjsjj.2023.0508.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(U2040206);国家自然科学基金重大项目(41890820)
2023-10-15
2023-10-15